Proactive rather than reactive response to terrorism – Israeli Expert

The AFL Finals series is here now and soon the Spring racing Carnival will be upon us are. This is an interesting perspective from an Israeli expert Brigadier General (Res) Nitzan Nuriel. In principle we can only agree. It is the preparation and preparedness that will protect the public from harm.

Explosive detection and crash barriers are essential. And as was evidenced in the Manchester bombing it is the time AFTER a major event that provides a cover of chaos. Here is the article . Consider it realistically. You will note he does not focus on the ethnicity, religion or background of terrorists. Rather he addresses the most important consideration – how to effectively deal with such a threat.

How to Prevent the Terrorism Threat from Disrupting Concerts and Sports Events?

The suicide bombing that struck a music concert in Manchester, England last night claimed the lives of 22 people and left 59 injured. In a special column, Brig. Gen. (res.) Nitzan Nuriel discusses the challenges of holding cultural and sporting events under the shadow of terror threats.

AP_17142834772483

One of the objectives of terrorism is to spread fear (terror) and anxiety among the general public to the point of disrupting everyday life. Major sports events, along with mass-audience cultural events (music concerts, festivals and so forth) have always been, and will always remain prime targets for terrorists owing to the extensive media coverage they receive.

Characteristically, the time and place of such an event are known and publicized well in advance. Massive crowds flock to these events, the public transport systems serving the venue where the event takes place are crowded and overloaded, and the process where the audience enters and leaves the venue leads to massive bottlenecks. All of these characteristics make mass-audience events a serious weakness and a preferred target for terrorist attacks. The primary question the authorities face when specific warnings have been received of imminent terrorist attacks is whether or not the event should be allowed to take place, whether it should be postponed, canceled or relocated to a different venue.

664102001001399640360no

The Israeli sports authorities were compelled to relocate international tournaments originally intended to be held in Israel to the neighboring island of Cyprus against the background of complex security situations. Similarly, states/teams scheduled to compete against Israeli teams took advantage of the same circumstances by demanding that tournaments be relocated from Israel to other, safer locations.

Recently, we encountered three situations where the tension between holding the match as planned and the option of postponing/canceling it evolved into a practical challenge. These situations involved the Israeli national football team in a match against Albania on November 8, 2015, the Maccabi Nahariya basketball team in a rematch in the context of the Euro Cup and a match in Turkey involving the Israeli football team Hapoel Be’er-Sheva. These are but a few examples from recent times where the dilemma was reported to the public, as there were many other examples involving different sports.

It should be noted that the ISA (Israel Security Agency – SHABAK) is the government organ responsible for authorizing or refusing such sports events. The ISA is required, along with the National Counterterrorism Bureau, to consolidate and submit a specific recommendation to the minister in charge. Naturally, there is always tension between the option of surrendering to terrorism by canceling the event and the option of taking the risk despite the concrete warnings.

shutterstock_393370627tiny

The terrorist organizations will be delighted to succeed in attacking international sports events generally and sports events involving Israeli participants in particular. As far as they are concerned, having the event canceled, postponed or relocated is a victory of sorts, achieved through a relatively minor effort. All they have to do is publish a video or some other electronic message that specifically threatens the event, and the organizers will start sweating when they ponder the dilemma of whether to allow the event to go ahead as planned or cancel it. If we accept this scenario, then terrorism will be able to disrupt our life almost effortlessly, in a manner where we will no longer be able to hold any events. A fabricated warning of a bomb planted at the venue where the event is about to take place will be sufficient to cause panic and lead to a postponement or even to cancellation.

So – what should be the appropriate policy for such circumstances? What can the organizers do to avoid a situation where the plans, and life itself, are unreasonably disrupted?

shutterstock_63072280tiny

I believe that the strength and resilience of a society that values life and its own survival, the risks notwithstanding, are measured – among other things – by its ability to maintain a planned routine of events. Does a basketball game or a football match justify taking risks involving human lives? Is it justified to take a risk when facing a tangible threat only to uphold the slogan “we will not allow terrorism to win and disrupt our life”? I believe that the organizers on behalf of the country hosting the match, game or performance should prepare in such a manner as to allow the event to take place almost under any circumstances. The proper way to accomplish this goal is to employ a system of advance preparation that analyzes the threats and develops a reasonable solution for every possible threat. There are no full-proof, 100% solutions, but a 100% effort is required during the planning stage, as well as during the implementation stage so that the risk of allowing terrorism to prevail is minimized. Canceling an event should be the very last resort, invoked only after it has become abundantly clear that despite the planning process, certain scenarios had not been provided with adequate solutions, and only then should the event be canceled. In any other scenario, other alternatives should be opted for, like enhancing security, expanding the security loops and even relocating the event to a different venue. The fight against terrorism is a long-distance run, and as such, it demands that we take calculated risks.

Brig. Gen. (res.) Nitzan Nuriel is the former head of Israel’s Counter-Terrorism Bureau.

Source: israeldefense.co.il

Time for Action – Protection for Major Events

With an audience capacity of 21,000 people, the Manchester Arena bombing outcome could well have been far more devastating. Mass panic seized the audience after the sound of the explosion resonated through the venue. Most audience members were young pre-teen girls, teenage girls, young women and their mothers. It was an appalling target with ISIS now claiming responsibility for the incident and the resultant 22 deaths and 59 seriously injured concert patrons.

manchester 2

The question on everyone’s lips is “What can we do to prevent such mindless acts?”. In truth there is a lot we can do. First base is most certainly intel via the Australian Federal Police, ASIO and other Federal Government Agencies and through the various State Police Forces.

But this presupposes organisation, planning and identifiable links with known terrorist organisations such as ISIS, Al Queda, Chechen separatists, etc.

The reality is that to a great extent the ISIS type movement is attractive to ‘lone wolves’; People like Man Haron Monis of the Lindt Cafe Siege in Sydney, the Tunisian truck hijacker in Marseilles, the gay nightclub shooter in Florida and many more.

manchester

These are unbalanced psychopathic types who use internet propaganda to justify totally sociopathic acts. They gain bomb recipes and perform copy-cat acts such as the German Truck Killer.

This type of perpetrator is far more difficult to detect and protect against.

The AML Risk Management team believe that actual protection at Major Event Venues, Transport Hubs, Shopping Centres, Schools and Universities is possible with the use of both intel then technology. Intel provides significant risk assessment information. Upon recognising and determining that indeed there is risk just what can be done?

aml-apu-asset-protection-units

Events at major sporting events, music concerts, music festivals all have controlled entrances. Transport Hubs such as Railway Stations, Bus Stations and Airports also have controlled entrances – to a greater or lesser degree.

Trained staff can monitor such entrances and when necessary, with the use of explosives detection units and soon to be released ‘walk thru’ scanning devices, it is possible to ensure a relatively secure environment is maintained for the public attending. The designated search teams (known as APUs) can detect the full range of commonly used explosives with simple bag scans. Such a scanning operation can be added comfortably to existing bag-search or wanding operations (eg. the MCG) or simply be deployed strategically to operate upon observation of suspicious behaviour or unusual behaviour (eg. Large Bags to Sporting Events).

shutterstock_63072280tiny

The APU team not only have significant Emergency Protocols that will diffuse and contain such a situation, it also has the equipment and deployment capability to absorb up to 90% of any blast or explosion (The APU team are trained professionals from Defence Force, Police and Fire Brigade backgrounds).

The victims in Manchester were ordinary people out to enjoy a night of fun – family members, children, mothers. It is imperative that we devise strategies that ensure this never happens again if it can possibly be prevented. The tragedy in itself gives Venues both the right and perhaps the obligation to impose some rigorous checking on anyone entering the venue. It’s time for action. Such tragedies can be minimised with forward thinking and planning. The detection of explosives is technically well advanced.

For further information please call AML Risk Management on 03 9326 2244.